A conjoint analysis study on self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing characteristics among black women in Indiana

Self-sampling for HPV testing may be a method to increase overall cervical cancer screening rates among Black women, who are underscreened for cervical cancer in parts of the US. The purpose of this study was to assess preferred characteristics for delivery of HPV self-sampling kits, return of HPV self-sampling kits, and communication of HPV test results and explore sociodemographic factors (income, education, and marital status) associated with acceptability of self-sampling for HPV testing

Fear of Breast Cancer Recurrence in African-American and Caucasian Breast Cancer Survivors

poster abstractProblem. Fear of breast cancer recurrence is a concern for 55-90% of long-term breast cancer survivors. Background. Fear of recurrence is recognized as a prevalent and long-term psychosocial consequence of surviving cancer. Breast cancer survivors often identify more than one worry about what a recurrence might threaten in their health, work, and family function (Vickberg, 2001, 2003; Ziner, 2008). Although more research has been conducted with Caucasian breast cancer survivors, less is known about the nature of fear of recurrence worries in African American breast cancer survivors. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare fear of recurrence and worries related to thoughts of recurrence between African-American (AA-BCS) and Caucasian breast cancer survivors ( C-BCS). Theory. Emotion theorist, such as Lazarus (1991) suggest that fear is an emotional response to an identifiable object, thought or event that is perceived as harmful. Methods. This is a secondary analysis of a larger study comparing quality of life of AA-BCS and C-BCS using a cross-section survey design. Sample. Female breast cancer survivors ( AA-BCS N = 62, C-BCS N = 72) who were 2-10 years post treatment. Measures. Concerns about Recurrence Sale (CARS) Vickberg (2003) is a scale with 30 Likerttype items and 5 sub-scales: Fear of recurrence Index (overall fear frequency, intensity and consistency). Four (4) subscales of what BCS worry about: Health worries, Role worries, Womanhood worries, and Death worries. Validity. Content analysis of focus group data (N=21) AA-BCS showed that no changes were recommended in the CARS. (Russell, Personal communication) Reliability. The CARS and subscales were found to have Good to adequate Cronbach’s alpha’ for AA-BCS and C-BCS. Specifically, FRI = .92 AA-BCS, .90 C-BCS, Health worries = .93 AA-BCS, .92 C-BCS, Role worries = .75 AA-BCS, .87 C-BCS, Womanhood worries .89, AABCS, .90, C-BCS, Death worries .81 AA-BCS, .92 C-BCS. Analysis. ANCOVA was used for analysis controlling for age, time since diagnosis, income, marital status, years of education and body mass index. Results. Fear of recurrence Indexes between AA-BCS (mean 9.8) and C-BCS (mean 11.5) were not statistically different (p = .199). Health worries (AA- BCS mean 1.1, C-BCS mean 1.6, p= .018), Role worries (AA-BCS mean .8, C- BCS mean 1.2, p = .05), and Death worries (AA- BCS mean 1.3,C- BCS mean 2.2, p = .01) were significantly different between AA-BCS and C-BCS. Womanhood worries were not significantly different. Conclusions. AA-BCS and C-BCS were equally afraid of a recurrence. Except of womanhood worries, AA-BCS had lower mean health, role and death worries than C-BCS. Implications. Understanding the underlying worries related to overall fear of recurrence can lead to more focused and perhaps effective nursing intervention for AA-BCS and C-BCS

RESOLUTION CAPACITY AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS IN THE EMERGENCY SERVICE OF THE SERGIO BERNALES HOSPITAL, LIMA 2023.

Objetivo: Determinar la relación entre la capacidad resolutiva y las características clínicas de los pacientes en el servicio de emergencia.Metodología: Estudio de enfoque cuantitativo, descriptivo, correlacional, de diseño no experimental y corte transversal. Población: Conformado por los pacientes adultos atendidos en el servicio de emergencia en los horarios de 6am, 12m y 6pm. Se utilizó una base de datos y como instrumento la escala de NEDOCS que consta de 7 ítems ya han sido validados anteriormente. Resultados: La investigación permitió evidenciar que existe relación significativa entre la capacidad resolutiva y las características clínicas, las cuales fueron tabuladas posteriormente a través de gráficos

Quality of Life in Younger versus Older Breast Cancer Survivors

poster abstractBackground: Breast cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers in the developing world, but with earlier detection and better treatment, the majority of breast cancer survivors will live many years after diagnosis. Breast cancer survivors may experience many symptoms that impact their quality of life, and these symptoms may vary by age. The purpose of this study is to compare breast cancer survivors who were diagnosed at 45 and under (n=469) with survivors diagnosed at 55 to 70 (n=584) years of age. Materials and methods: Participants were identified through a large cooperative group (Eastern Cancer Cooperative Group). Eligibility criteria included use of chemotherapy at initial diagnosis, being 3 to 8 years from diagnosis, and not having a recurrence of breast cancer. The mean current age of younger survivors was 45.2 and for older survivors was 66.7. Women who agreed to participate were sent a survey and informed consent which was completed and returned via mail. Overall, 80% of eligible women contacted by researchers agreed to participate. Measures included physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and overall quality of life constructs. All measurements had good reported validity and reliability. A total of 469 younger and 584 older breast cancer survivors are included. Linear regression was used to compare the two groups on continuous outcomes while adjusting for the following potentially confounding covariates: marital status (married versus not), years of education, and total household income, and years since diagnosis. Results: Younger survivors scored significantly worse than older survivors on gynecological problems, sexual enjoyment, attention function, and overall reported symptoms. Psychologically, younger survivors demonstrated greater symptom distress, greater depression, and greater state and trait anxiety than older survivors. Younger survivors had lower marital satisfaction scores. Younger survivors reported greater fear of recurrence and less favorable body image. Younger survivors reported lower perceived social support from their partners and greater social constraint. Older survivors held higher spiritual beliefs and behaviors as compared to younger survivors. Perceived self efficacy for dealing with problems related to cancer survivorship was lower in younger survivors as compared to older survivors. For overall quality of life measures, younger survivors reported lower index of well being scores than older survivors and reported that breast cancer had a greater impact on their life. Health care service use was greater for younger as opposed to older survivors both during and after treatment. Conclusions: Younger survivors reported significantly more problems on several, physical, psychological, social and generic quality of life issues as compared to older survivors. Results indicate a need to proactively assess quality of life issues in younger women at time of diagnosis

Group variable selection via convex log-exp-sum penalty with application to a breast cancer survivor study

In many scientific and engineering applications, covariates are naturally grouped. When the group structures are available among covariates, people are usually interested in identifying both important groups and important variables within the selected groups. Among existing successful group variable selection methods, some methods fail to conduct the within group selection. Some methods are able to conduct both group and within group selection, but the corresponding objective functions are non-convex. Such a non-convexity may require extra numerical effort. In this article, we propose a novel Log-Exp-Sum(LES) penalty for group variable selection. The LES penalty is strictly convex. It can identify important groups as well as select important variables within the group. We develop an efficient group-level coordinate descent algorithm to fit the model. We also derive non-asymptotic error bounds and asymptotic group selection consistency for our method in the high-dimensional setting where the number of covariates can be much larger than the sample size. Numerical results demonstrate the good performance of our method in both variable selection and prediction. We applied the proposed method to an American Cancer Society breast cancer survivor dataset. The findings are clinically meaningful and may help design intervention programs to improve the qualify of life for breast cancer survivors

Identification of subgroups with differential treatment effects for longitudinal and multiresponse variables

We describe and evaluate a regression tree algorithm for finding subgroups with differential treatments effects in randomized trials with multivariate outcomes. The data may contain missing values in the outcomes and covariates, and the treatment variable is not limited to two levels. Simulation results show that the regression tree models have unbiased variable selection and the estimates of subgroup treatment effects are approximately unbiased. A bootstrap calibration technique is proposed for constructing confidence intervals for the treatment effects. The method is illustrated with data from a longitudinal study comparing two diabetes drugs and a mammography screening trial comparing two treatments and a control

Coping with physical and psychological symptoms: a qualitative study of advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers

PURPOSE: Advanced lung cancer patients have high rates of multiple physical and psychological symptoms, and many of their family caregivers experience significant distress. However, little is known about strategies that these patients and their family caregivers employ to cope with physical and psychological symptoms. This study aimed to identify strategies for coping with various physical and psychological symptoms among advanced, symptomatic lung cancer patients and their primary family caregivers. METHODS: Patients identified their primary family caregiver. Individual semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 advanced, symptomatic lung cancer patients and primary family caregivers. Thematic analysis of interview data was framed by stress and coping theory. RESULTS: Patients and caregivers reported maintaining a normal routine and turning to family and friends for support with symptom management, which often varied in its effectiveness. Whereas support from health-care professionals and complementary and alternative medicine were viewed favorably, reactions to Internet and in-person support groups were mixed due to the tragic nature of participants' stories. Several cognitive coping strategies were frequently reported (i.e., changing expectations, maintaining positivity, and avoiding illness-related thoughts) as well as religious coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that advanced lung cancer patients and caregivers may be more receptive to cognitive and religious approaches to symptom management and less receptive to peer support. Interventions should address the perceived effectiveness of support from family and friends

Development of a Symptom Management Intervention: Qualitative Feedback from Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and their Family Caregivers

Background: Little is known about cancer patient and family caregiver preferences for the content and format of nonpharmacologic interventions. Revising interventions based on patient and caregiver feedback before implementation may improve intervention feasibility and acceptability, especially in the context of advanced-stage cancer. Objectives: The aim of the study was to obtain feedback from patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and their family caregivers on the content and format of a nonpharmacologic symptom management intervention under development. The intervention blended evidence-based cognitive-behavioral and emotion-focused strategies to reduce physical and psychological symptoms. Methods: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 21 patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and caregivers. Participants reviewed handouts regarding intervention components and provided feedback. Results: Patients and caregivers desired intervention components that addressed the patient's high symptom burden such as education regarding treatment adverse effects and the provision of various coping tools. Offering interventions with a brief or flexible length and delivering them via telephone were other suggestions for enhancing intervention acceptability. Participants also preferred an equal focus on patient and caregiver concerns and a more positive intervention framework. Conclusions: Intervention preferences of patients with advanced-stage lung cancer and caregivers underscore the severity of the disease and treatment process and the need to adapt interventions to patients with high symptom burden. These preferences may be incorporated into future intervention trials to improve participant recruitment and retention. Implications for Practice: Nurses can modify interventions to meet the needs of patients with advanced-stage, symptomatic lung cancer and caregivers. For example, flexibility regarding intervention content and length may accommodate those with significant symptoms